HOME CONFERENCE OF ISFSI

Everyone Goes Home


Fire Corps


NFFF



CFSI


Firefighter Near Miss
 

Firefighter Close Calls
 
 

SAFETY TRAINING: WE'RE LOVING IT
-
Safety Training: We're Loving It Just as a good short-order cook retains customers by preparing a satisfying meal, a good safety trainer keeps the audience engaged during the session and willing to attend another. OH, no—health and safety training again?! In every industry, this is a common response to the announcement of an upcoming session. People absolutely despise safety training because it is the same old, dull, boring, and repetitive material, year after year. From the safety professional’s perspective, the worst part of it is that no one actually gains anything from these tedious meetings: The employees become desensitized, the organization loses production hours, and the safety trainer wastes time preparing and presenting the same old, meaningless topics. In the end, all that remains is a list of names and signatures confirming physical attendance—and the sinking suspicion that no one was mentally present. That is simply not good enough. OSHA wants the training to be effective: The information must stay with the employees after they leave the training room, and it must be applied on a daily basis. The Presentation
 What can we do to make the training sessions bearable, acceptable, or even enjoyable? The “5P” acronym sums it up precisely: Prior-Preparation- Prevents-Poor-Performance. For a lecture to be effective, its cornerstone must be good preparation. Doing our homework, however, cannot be confined to simply getting the notes and slides ready or memorizing the materials. Preparation also involves designing an impressive introduction that will capture everyone’s attention. This is the time to “kick it up a notch” and get everyone into it. A funny opening statement, an interesting video clip, a slideshow with background music, or something totally unexpected can facilitate the transition and make the lecturer the focal point. In addition, a smile from the instructor will break the ice and relax any participant who may be nervous or intimidated. Dull and uninspiring introductions will be perceived as only a precursor of what is to follow. Apologetic opening statements, on the other hand, sound weak and pathetic. If the trainer starts by making excuses for the topic, the material, or even his/her competence level, the audience will form an impression that will be difficult to counteract. A dispassionate, monotonous trainer will quickly bore and fatigue the participants, who will soon become uninterested and unresponsive. Conversely, a presenter who is vibrant, energetic, and passionate about the subject is likely to influence people and motivate them to work safely. The Content 
 Once the presentation is under way, we have to ensure we are providing the right content to the right people at the right time. The classroom is the opportunity for the safety professional to assume the role of educator, innovator, leader, and catalyst for change. It is not a forum for the instructor to flaunt his/her intelligence or expertise. Instead, it should be the place where information regarding safety is conveyed in a manner consistent and coherent with the needs of the audience. For people who mix chemicals at a factory, misplaced and superfluous technical jargon results only in frustration and resentment. They do not want or need to hear that ammonia is a lacrimator, which is an agent that induces the lacrimar glands—that are located superiortemporally to each ophthalmic cavity and posterior to the upper palpebra—to secrete lacrimar fluid! What they should know can be communicated without unnecessary scientific language: Among other things, exposure to ammonia vapors has the same effect as peeling and chopping onions. Everyone can relate to that. The majority of our efforts as trainers traditionally focuses on presenting facts, statistics, regulations, and standards. In doing so, we concentrate on the left side of the brain, which favors logic, reasoning, linear thinking, and the sciences. Roger Sperry, the psychobiologist who first ascribed different strengths to the two halves of the brain, would concur that the right hemisphere is not being engaged. This section supports the arts, non-linear thinking, humor, and imagination. Experience has taught me that the trick is to encourage our audience to utilize both logical and creative sides of their brains. Clever techniques, energetic presentations, appropriate humor, and even the occasional ad lib will keep the entire cerebrum active. As a part of an Industrial Safety course at Central Connecticut State University, I was trying to impress upon my students the importance of production with safety, as opposed to production and safety. Suddenly, it came to me: the Cheeseburger Model. At first they looked at me as if I had just grown hair, but with some explanation and convincing, it began to make sense. Production is the meat, the food that fills the stomach. (In some cases, such as academia, education is the meat.) Safety is the cheese, but cheese alone will not satisfy one’s appetite. However, just as a slice of cheese enhances the taste of a meat patty, safety enhances production. We all know that the cheese comes with the meat; it is not a side order. They are put together in advance to become the one unit we are about to consume: the cheeseburger. I knew the entire class was paying attention because at that point, my students asked about the significance of the bun. I stopped and thought about it for a moment. Suddenly, I exclaimed, “Management! It holds everything together!” Management supports production and promotes safety. Without the bun, all you have is a sloppy piece of meat with the cheese melting and slipping away! The metaphor I had just come up with was working great, but how could we fit the all-important fixings into the model? After some deliberation, we decided the tasty condiments represent delivery techniques. They make the burger unique and special because, after all, the goal is to “have it your way.” Let’s face it: All buns taste the same; management is generally universal. Meat is meat; production is getting the job done. With safety advancements and new or revised regulations, the type of cheese may change. The burger, however, can still taste great if we top it with the employee’s favorite condiments. The Instructor 
 So the only component missing from the model is the chef. This is where we come in: The safety instructor is the short-order cook, the person who arranges all of the ingredients together and adds a personal touch to make a delicious meal. He/she is the person who takes the order by analyzing the organization’s training needs and the audience’s background, experience, and preferences. The safety trainer listens to the customers’ requests and prepares the orders accordingly. The U.S. Coast Guard uses the phrase “rigid-flexibility” to describe the adaptability of the Incident Command System (ICS), which is now part of the National Incident Management System. It is a brilliant expression that, initially, might sound like an oxymoron, but it is about combining a rigid core of values and goals with the flexibility to reach and maintain them. As safety trainers, we need to abide by that phrase: We must strive to deliver each topic with the intention to make it stick, but how we accomplish the task should depend on the preference of the audience. I firmly believe instructors within a particular organization have an important advantage. Like cooks at the company cafeteria, we know our customers and how they like their burgers prepared. We are involved in the system, yet removed enough to observe activities and behaviors from an objective perspective. Just as a good short-order cook retains customers by preparing a satisfying meal, a good safety trainer keeps his/her audience engaged and involved during the session and willing to attend another. The trust and comfort that develop slowly between us and our fellow employees are obstacles not easily overcome by the contracted trainer who is there for only a few hours to serve canned goods. The outside instructors miss out on the little things that you and I, as members of the organization, can use to our benefit. We connect to our audience daily through small gestures, common experiences, and imperceptible details. However, we can be neither complacent with our delivery nor content with our flashy PowerPoints. As the U.S. Marine Corps’ motto suggests, we need to improvise new ways to deliver old topics, adapt to the changing times, standards, and audiences, and overcome any hurdle that may inhibit the learning process. We need to be rigid yet flexible, endorsing safe practices and adhering to regulations while developing creative hooks, such as the Cheeseburger Model, that will lure our audience’s interest and make them come back. People may never like safety training, but they may like the person delivering it. If we win them over, the cheeseburger we are about to serve will be much easier to swallow. Lara Volpe, the Ergonomics and IAQ Consultant at WCSU, contributed to this article. Pano Koukopoulos - ISFSI Member Pano Koukopoulos, CET, CHMM, is Associate Director of Environmental & Facilities Services at Western Connecticut State University in Danbury, Conn. He has earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Northeastern University and an M.A. in Oceanography and Limnology from WCSU. He holds certifications in Hazardous Materials Management, Hazardous Materials Technology, and Environmental Training. He has been involved in EH&S for the past 11 years and is an advisory board member at the Northwest CT Regional Hazmat Team and an adjunct instructor at WCSU (Biology), CCSU (Industrial Technology), and the CT Fire Academy (Hazardous Materials).

 
 
DEDICATION AND COMMITMENT - “THE GUTS TO DO MORE”
-
As instructors we have a duty to provide the highest quality of service and instruction. We must be our students’ inspiration to strive for excellence. The question is, Just how dedicated and committed are you? Stop and take a look in the mirror, because the future of the fire service rests on today’s instructors’ shoulders. Organizations, leaders, and instructors themselves must determine how well training is delivered. There are a variety of methods to carry out this task. Head nods, smiles and reaction questionnaires can be given to the students to be completed; persons who are subject matter experts or senior trainers can audit the sessions; post test scores can be used on the job performance evaluations; and instructors can do self evaluations and peer assessments. The optimum time to evaluate the work of an instructor is while he or she is actually in the process of delivering instruction. Observation is recommended. However, observation is only effective if it is driven by objective, comprehensive, reliable, and accurate standards. Follow these steps to create and use instruments to evaluate the delivery of training: Step 1: Identify and define the objectives of the evaluation, and determine the instrument type(s) to be utilized in gathering assessment data. Determine why the evaluation is being conducted. It may be to provide feedback on an instructor on a specific delivery problem, to evaluate the overall competence of an instructor during the delivery of a program, or to define specific circumstances of a delivery that may require the redesigning or modification of materials and logistics. Step 2: Consider how the information will be summarized and to whom it will be reported. Evaluation data can serve many purposes and can be interpreted many different ways. It is important that clear decisions define why, when, and from whom data is being collected. It is important to evaluate collected information and its relation to the original objectives that caused the need for the evaluation. Step 3: Identify and define the specific competencies and performances to be measured. First you must determine which competencies will serve as the basis of the evaluation. Typically, a detailed evaluation involves no more than three competencies, whereas a more general evaluation may evaluate multiple competencies. Secondly, the objectives of the evaluation must be clearly specified so that the evaluator and the instructor being evaluated understand what is being measured Step 4: Determine the sources of data. You can obtain evaluation data from a number of different sources. Some common methods of data collection are evaluations by evaluators, co-instructors, peers, self-evaluations, learners, clients, and training managers / responsible parties. It is important to remember that the varying levels of skills in the evaluators can influence data. Step 5: Write the questions. For quality control, questions must be linked to a specific desired outcome for the evaluation. When the questions are written we can control the specificity or generality of the individual item. These controls are essential to keep the evaluation instrument practical, manageable, reliable, and valid. Step 6: Design the format and layout of the instrument. Evaluation instruments must be written clearly and concisely for what is to be measured. The evaluation must contain unambiguous directions for use and feature ordered questions or items to be evaluated. Finally, instruments must be user friendly. This means they are easy to read, have enough space for documentation of questions and answers, and are easy to use. Step 7: Pilot-test the instrument, and obtain feedback. Prior to using a document for program evaluation, allow it to be pilot-tested. This will allow others to provide feedback on the instrument’s adequacy and usefulness. This pilot-test helps the evaluators determine how well the instrument design and layout meets the objectives you are looking for. It also allows for the evaluation of the instrument to ensure it is designed to provide what it is intended to do. Since instrument development is time consuming and costly, it is imperative to evaluate the tool to ensure that it will provide the best information possible. Step 8: Create the final instrument, and implement the evaluation. The final instrument must provide the data needed to ensure that the training achieves its objectives or job performance requirements. Instruments may be used to assess a variety of aspects focused around training. The instrument may be used to assess the instructor’s performance, logistics, usefulness of instructional methods, course materials and content, media, and design adequacy of course. Effective fire service organizations must recognize their responsibilities to assist in the professional development of their instructors. Instructors must also realize that they have areas that need development. As the leaders of the fire service, we as instructors have to have The Guts To Do More. We must set a precedent for the future. We begin that precedent with the instructor in the mirror. We have an obligation of Dedication and Commitment to educating the future of the fire service. - Doug Cline, Second Vice President - ISFSI

 

Search for News stories:
Search by : Month | Year | Keyword | Category